
I have to say that I am looking forward to Issue #9 of Woodworking magazine. This is not meant to be a shameless shill for the magazine (though it is excellent) but perhaps to put a little perspective in the Luddites who insist the mark of the beast is "UL Approved" and the path of the truly righteous is best trod wearing pilgrim shoes and pirate shirts.
The buzz is that the issue will address at least in part, the Hand tool vs. Machine debate as it relates to work flow, layout and all around methodology in the creation of a finished piece. I have to say for the record that I really DON'T GET how some cats get all big bodied about the supposed superiority of working exclusively with hand tools. I recently read about some guy who uses an axe instead of a chainsaw (or bucksaw, or bow saw, or brother-in-laws p.o.s. pick-up) to harvest wood and blithering on about it taking several hours work and implying that somehow made the finished piece better. All I will say about that is that here in the 21st. century to take digital photos of your folly and upload them to the masses on your blog, all the while crowing about the older, slower, simpler ways seems to be a rather untenable position from which to preach. Tools and techniques evolve, improvements are made in the finished product and time is saved. It's all about using the appropriate too for the job or failing that, making do with what is at hand. It would be ridiculous to chuck a chamfer bit into a router to break the edge of a couple of planks going into the back of a case piece and it would be equally ridiculous to field all the panels in an 800 s.f. library with a plane. I can see it now, some kook with a couple of scrap blocks padding the "C" clamps that hold a 14 x 28" mahogany panel to his bench (within plain view of his SHAPER TABLE) while going about feverishly raising the first end of his first panel (of 28 ) and thinking it might be time to hone his nickers.
I will submit that it would be time to remove the head from the knickers.
And I say this knowing that when I go to work the two large gatemouth bags that hold my router bit bags, blade wrenches and pneumatic nailer repair kits also hold a Stanley #9 1/2 block plane, a Lie Nielsen #102 low angle apron plane, a Stanley #60 1/2, a #5 1/4, a #20 compass plane, a #78 duplex filletster, a #92 rabbet and on the last job the trusty #8 above. It seemed the right tool for the job.
It is seen here jointing the edge of a rather large window jamb, an on site laminated, 11" wide hunk of clear heart redwood. Formerly a 20' 2x12, it was resawn and cold bent laminated into a 13' 2 3/8" radius with a chord length of right at 16 feet. It didn't seem likely that jointing it on the planer was going to work out too well ;-D
I mention the planes because in the course of the day several of them are always employed, day in day out.
But they're not the be all end all. Or so I think . . .
The buzz is that the issue will address at least in part, the Hand tool vs. Machine debate as it relates to work flow, layout and all around methodology in the creation of a finished piece. I have to say for the record that I really DON'T GET how some cats get all big bodied about the supposed superiority of working exclusively with hand tools. I recently read about some guy who uses an axe instead of a chainsaw (or bucksaw, or bow saw, or brother-in-laws p.o.s. pick-up) to harvest wood and blithering on about it taking several hours work and implying that somehow made the finished piece better. All I will say about that is that here in the 21st. century to take digital photos of your folly and upload them to the masses on your blog, all the while crowing about the older, slower, simpler ways seems to be a rather untenable position from which to preach. Tools and techniques evolve, improvements are made in the finished product and time is saved. It's all about using the appropriate too for the job or failing that, making do with what is at hand. It would be ridiculous to chuck a chamfer bit into a router to break the edge of a couple of planks going into the back of a case piece and it would be equally ridiculous to field all the panels in an 800 s.f. library with a plane. I can see it now, some kook with a couple of scrap blocks padding the "C" clamps that hold a 14 x 28" mahogany panel to his bench (within plain view of his SHAPER TABLE) while going about feverishly raising the first end of his first panel (of 28 ) and thinking it might be time to hone his nickers.
I will submit that it would be time to remove the head from the knickers.
And I say this knowing that when I go to work the two large gatemouth bags that hold my router bit bags, blade wrenches and pneumatic nailer repair kits also hold a Stanley #9 1/2 block plane, a Lie Nielsen #102 low angle apron plane, a Stanley #60 1/2, a #5 1/4, a #20 compass plane, a #78 duplex filletster, a #92 rabbet and on the last job the trusty #8 above. It seemed the right tool for the job.
It is seen here jointing the edge of a rather large window jamb, an on site laminated, 11" wide hunk of clear heart redwood. Formerly a 20' 2x12, it was resawn and cold bent laminated into a 13' 2 3/8" radius with a chord length of right at 16 feet. It didn't seem likely that jointing it on the planer was going to work out too well ;-D
I mention the planes because in the course of the day several of them are always employed, day in day out.
But they're not the be all end all. Or so I think . . .
